IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v9y2021i1p1997160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical efficiency, technological progress and productivity growth of large and medium manufacturing industries in Ethiopia: A data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Obsa Teferi Erena
  • Mesfin Mala Kalko
  • Sara Adugna Debele
  • Christian Nsiah

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess empirically how the technical efficiency scores for 43 sub-sectors and their determinants over the period 2010 to 2017 show significant variation across the sub-sectors. The study applied a two-step approach for measuring technical efficiency and its determinants. A data envelopment analysis output-orientation (i.e. both CCR & BCC models) is used to estimate technical efficiency scores for 43 sub-sectors over the period 2010 to 2017. Malmquist productivity index (MPI) output orientation is also applied to compute technical efficiency change, technological progress, and productivity change. The estimated technical efficiency score shows significant variation across the sub-sectors. Thus, we used a Tobit regression model to scrutinize what defines the variation in technical efficiency scores using three years of panel data which covers 2015 to 2017. Moreover, the 43 sub-sectors were further grouped into 14 major sub-sectors and classified as public and private to examine whether there is a technical efficiency score discrepancy between the same sub-sectors operating under different ownership. For measuring overall technical efficiency, we used two output variables (i.e., value-added and operating surplus) and two input variables (i.e., total fixed assets and a total number of employees). When reducing the sub-sectors to fourteen major groups, the operating surplus was not included, thus we used value-added and total sales as output variables and total fixed assets, the total number of employees, and cost of raw materials used in the production process as input variables. To shed light on the source of inefficiency, technical efficiency is decomposed into pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. This study found that the sector had experienced a 37 percent technical efficiency in overall average when the CCR model was used. The study also claims that public owned subsectors are less likely to be efficient than private subsectors. The regression results show the capital expenditure ratio has a significant positive influence on technical efficiency. The Malmquist index result also shows, on average, the sector had registered a 10.5% technological progress and a 13% productivity growth over the period 2010–2017. The findings of the study would have implications for policymakers, government, and firm owners in that it offers an insight into the source of productivity growth in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Obsa Teferi Erena & Mesfin Mala Kalko & Sara Adugna Debele & Christian Nsiah, 2021. "Technical efficiency, technological progress and productivity growth of large and medium manufacturing industries in Ethiopia: A data envelopment analysis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1997160-199, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1997160
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1997160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2021.1997160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2021.1997160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1997160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.