IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v8y2020i1p1782129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What determines import demand in Zimbabwe? Evidence from a gravity model

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald Ngoma
  • Burcu Berke

Abstract

The notion of the determinants of import demand has become a major policy issue in most countries due to the persistent trade deficits being experienced and their effects on the economy. Against this backdrop, this study empirically examined the factors determining import demand in Zimbabwe using a gravity model. Forty trading partners for Zimbabwe and data for the period 2004 to 2017 were employed. The model was estimated using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) with and without fixed effects and the findings were that gross domestic product and trade openness for Zimbabwe and her trading partners had a positive impact on import demand. Furthermore, inflation and population for Zimbabwe as well as its trading partners’ and bilateral distance were found to be negatively related to import demand. More so, the study found out that dollarization has managed to increase import demand. Based on these findings, policies directed at reducing import demand should target trade openness, population and inflation level. The findings also imply that de-dollarization is an effective strategy to reduce import demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald Ngoma & Burcu Berke, 2020. "What determines import demand in Zimbabwe? Evidence from a gravity model," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1782129-178, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1782129
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1782129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2020.1782129
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2020.1782129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1782129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.