IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v7y2019i1p1608052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Myopia, liquidity constraints and private consumption: the case of Cote d’Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Yaya Keho

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate the behavior of private consumption in Cote d’Ivoire under the permanent income hypothesis using annual data for the period 1970–2016. The first objective is to test the validity of the permanent income hypothesis in Cote d’Ivoire. Our second concern is to investigate the reason explaining the rejection of this hypothesis. The data consists of real household consumption, real gross domestic product, and the real interest rate on deposits. The empirical analysis uses the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model proposed by Shin et al. This approach allows us to simultaneously test the short and long run nonlinearities through positive and negative partial sum decompositions of income. The results suggest that the absolute income hypothesis is valid rather than permanent income hypothesis. Also, there is evidence pointing to the rejection of the permanent income hypothesis-driven by the presence of liquidity constraints rather than myopia. As policy implications, the lending conditions of banks should be relaxed to increase the accessibility of households to credits. In addition, private consumption can be increased through income or consumption tax reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaya Keho, 2019. "Myopia, liquidity constraints and private consumption: the case of Cote d’Ivoire," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1608052-160, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1608052
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1608052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2019.1608052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2019.1608052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1608052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.