IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v7y2019i1p1607050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recruitment strategies in a university institution: a theoretical cost minimization approach

Author

Listed:
  • Iddrisu Awudu
  • Saravanan Kuppusamy
  • Mario Norbis
  • Matthew O’Connor

Abstract

We study faculty recruitment issues in a university. We develop a cost minimization model that considers the decision-making process for the university administration by proposing a new approach of selecting tenure and non-tenure track faculty who are expected to achieve the institutional research and teaching goals. We explain the existence of tenure from an economic perspective. We propose a faculty tenure-granting process for a variety of institutions ranging from pure-teaching, teaching emphasis, research emphasis and pure-research institutions. We find that a teaching-emphasis or a pure-teaching institution (a research-emphasis or a pure-research institution) can increase the emphasis on research (teaching) without increasing costs. This paper makes important contributions to the university recruitment strategy by providing a set of guidelines on how to manage teaching and research incentives. The paper also contributes to the ongoing debate about tenure by providing a newer perspective and to the general theory of strategic university management.

Suggested Citation

  • Iddrisu Awudu & Saravanan Kuppusamy & Mario Norbis & Matthew O’Connor, 2019. "Recruitment strategies in a university institution: a theoretical cost minimization approach," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1607050-160, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1607050
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1607050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2019.1607050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2019.1607050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1607050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.