IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v6y2018i1p1446654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation in a common pool resource game: Strategic behavior and a sense of intimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Takehisa Kumakawa

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates two possible reasons for cooperative investment decisions in common pool resource games with two players. One reason is strategic behavior: subjects, who are allowed to interact with their partners repeatedly, attempt to build a long-term relationship and elicit cooperation from their partners. Another reason is a sense of intimacy: as the pairings of subjects are fixed throughout the experiment, subjects develop a sense of intimacy with their partners and make decisions by considering their benefit. The results suggest that cooperative decisions can be explained almost solely by subjects’ strategic behaviors; however, the hypothesis that a sense of intimacy governed cooperative investment was not supported.

Suggested Citation

  • Takehisa Kumakawa, 2018. "Cooperation in a common pool resource game: Strategic behavior and a sense of intimacy," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1446654-144, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1446654
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2018.1446654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2018.1446654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2018.1446654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José J. Domínguez & Giulio Ecchia & Natalia Montinari & Raimondello Orsini, 2023. "When Workplace Democracy Backfires. Lab Evidence on Honesty and Cooperation," ThE Papers 23/02, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    2. Yehouenou, Lauriane S. & Morgan, Stephen N. & Grogan, Kelly A., 2021. "Managing a Multiuse Resource with Payments for Ecosystems Services: A Classroom Game," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(3), September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1446654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.