Author
Abstract
We propose a procedure for identifying instrumental variables to be used in causal analyses that can preclude the effects of unobserved confounders and reverse causality. Being based on graphical models, our novel approach employs four sequential regressions to infer the role of endogenous variables (potential cause) as colliders or complete mediators in the relationship between candidates for instruments and the explained variable (potential effect). The inclusion restriction condition is met by the fact that the instruments are, by definition, determinants of the endogenous variables while compliance with the exclusion restriction condition is deduced from the role (e.g. complete mediation) of the endogenous variables with respect to the other variables analyzed. Given an underlying data generating process, we consider not only cases where all relevant variables are included in the analyses but also situations when some of them are omitted (e.g. due to data unavailability or because analysts are not aware of them). Simulation results support our method’s ability to identify statistically valid instruments that lead to correct causal conclusions. An empirical case illustrating the application of our method is presented in an online appendix.This paper introduces a novel approach to identifying instrumental variables in regression analyses. As the proposed method can preclude the influence of unobserved common factors (confounders) and reverse causality, the resulting estimates can be interpreted as causal. The implementation of the method is relatively simple, requiring only basic knowledge of linear regression. Therefore, the work is expected to have a significant impact across many research fields, given the wide interest in causal inference. The method’s favorable performance is supported by simulations and an empirical example based on real-world data.
Suggested Citation
Fernando Moreira, 2025.
"Identifying instrumental variables for causal inference,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 2588052-258, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:2588052
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2025.2588052
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:2588052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.