Author
Listed:
- Yan Su
- Wanjun Zheng
- Ping Yu
Abstract
Against the backdrop of a flourishing digital economy, digital consumption has emerged as a crucial driving force behind the expansion of domestic demand, overcoming of spatial and temporal limitations, and enhancement of the efficiency of resource allocation, and provides a new impetus to promote energy transition. Using the quasi-natural experiment provided by the national information consumption pilot policy, the results of difference-in-differences model show that digital consumption significantly promotes energy transition, and this finding still holds after a series of robustness tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that digital consumption accelerates energy transition mainly through information diffusion, innovation-driven, industrial structure optimization, and consumption expansion effects. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promoting effect of digital consumption on energy transition is more pronounced in cities with larger populations, those in the eastern region, those that are not old industrial bases, and those with higher digital infrastructure levels. The paper provides policy implications for the further strengthening of the development of digital consumption, the continuous unlocking of the potential for information consumption, and the facilitation of urban energy transition.This study explores how digital consumption influence energy transition in China by using national information consumption pilot policy. The findings show a positive impact of digital consumption on all dimensions of energy transition, and the working channels contains information diffusion, innovation-driven, industrial structure optimization, and consumption expansion effects. The findings provide actionable insights for policymakers aimed at accelerating the goal of energy transition through targeted digital consumption strategies.
Suggested Citation
Yan Su & Wanjun Zheng & Ping Yu, 2025.
"The impact of digital consumption on energy transition in China,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 2568637-256, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:2568637
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2025.2568637
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:2568637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.