IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v10y2022i1p2034281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability of positive selection technique for seed yam production in Ghana and Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Osei-Adu
  • Robert Aidoo
  • Simon Cudjoe Fialor
  • Stella Ama Ennin
  • Kingsley Osei
  • Bright Owusu Asante

Abstract

Over the years, the traditional seed system has failed to deliver quality seed yam for propagation. This is due to the high incidence and severity of the yam mosaic virus leading to yield losses of 52.6%–65.4%. The Positive Selection (PS) technique has shown promise as a possible mitigation measure. This study was therefore aimed at evaluating the profitability of seed-yam production through the use of PS technique as a viral mitigation measure. Three hundred and sixty-eight (368) seed yam farmers across Ghana and Nigeria were sampled. Profitability was determined using Return on Investment (ROI) and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis. Regression analysis was applied for the determinants. Result from this study indicates that seed yam production is more profitable when the effect of the yam mosaic virus is mitigated using PS technique with a net return of US$ 3,417.98/ha compared to US$ 1,795.58/ha for non-use. This implies the use of PS technique can increase seed yam profitability by 26.69%. Sex, farmer experience in yam production, education, migration status, extension contact, off-farm income and use of PS technique were significant determinants of profitability. It is therefore recommended that the PS technique be widely disseminated as a mitigation strategy for the control of the yam mosaic virus disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Osei-Adu & Robert Aidoo & Simon Cudjoe Fialor & Stella Ama Ennin & Kingsley Osei & Bright Owusu Asante, 2022. "Profitability of positive selection technique for seed yam production in Ghana and Nigeria," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2034281-203, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2034281
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2034281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2022.2034281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2022.2034281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2034281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.