IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2135210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial reporting quality of financial institutions: Literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Mahdi Sahi
  • Alaa Mahdi Sahi
  • Alhamzah F. Abbas
  • Saleh F. A. Khatib

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine and synthesize the existing literature on financial disclosure by financial institutions. It presents a systematic literature review of 204 studies on this topic published from 1990 to 2022. The studies were retrieved from Scopus database. In addition, this review highlights the gaps in current literature including contradictory results, explores the potential data sources for empirical researchers, and offers guidance for investigating prospective areas for future studies. The study found monitoring attributes to be the key determinants of financial reporting quality. Yet, the existing literature concentrated on internal/external auditing and audit committee characteristics whilst giving limited attention to the functions of other monitoring mechanisms, i.e., board of directors. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that efficient financial disclosure could boost the performance and evaluation of firms as well as whether these consequences are influenced by differences in the institutional and protection environment between markets. The contribution of this study resides in the application of systematic literature review to a burgeoning study topic, enabling an examination of the state-of-the-art financial reporting in financial institutions, an area that has received little attention in the literature. Based on the content investigation of the literature, future paths and implications are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Mahdi Sahi & Alaa Mahdi Sahi & Alhamzah F. Abbas & Saleh F. A. Khatib, 2022. "Financial reporting quality of financial institutions: Literature review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2135210-213, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2135210
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2135210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135210
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2135210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.