IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v12y2025i1p2482012.html

Key requirements for adventure tourism: a comparative study of Ecuador and Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua
  • Mauricio Carvache-Franco
  • Marlen Treviño-Villalobos
  • Orly Carvache-Franco
  • Luis Felipe Sancho-Jiménez
  • Wilmer Carvache-Franco

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the factors influencing the requirements for adventure tourism among Costa Rican and Ecuadorian tourists after the COVID-19 pandemic. A quantitative approach was used with an empirical and descriptive cross-sectional methodology. Surveys were administered to tourists, yielding 326 valid questionnaires in Costa Rica and 318 in Ecuador. The variables studied included sociodemographic characteristics, factors affecting adventure tourism, and key requirements for this activity. For data analysis, non-parametric tests such as Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon were employed due to the ordinal nature of the variables and the presence of skewed distributions. The results revealed significant differences in tourists’ perceptions between Ecuador’s coastal destinations and Costa Rica’s natural destinations. Among the main conclusions, it is highlighted that the geographical context significantly impacts the perception of adventure tourism. Tourists in Ecuador perceived better fulfillment of key requirements, greater biosecurity, learning opportunities, social influence, and relaxation than tourists in Costa Rica. These findings offer a deeper understanding of current trends and provide practical recommendations for improving adventure tourism in both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Marlen Treviño-Villalobos & Orly Carvache-Franco & Luis Felipe Sancho-Jiménez & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2025. "Key requirements for adventure tourism: a comparative study of Ecuador and Costa Rica," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2482012-248, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:2482012
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2482012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2025.2482012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2025.2482012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:2482012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.