IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2320812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability reporting and greenwashing: a bibliometrics assessment in G7 and non-G7 nations

Author

Listed:
  • Sheela Sundarasen
  • Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak
  • Sanjay Goel

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the scholarly work and discussion on greenwashing in sustainability reporting (GiSR) and tease out dominant themes that emerge from the literature, and the different emphasis of research between G7 and non-G7 nations. Based on a total of 87 articles from the Web of Science (WoS) database, this study adopts the bibliometrics and content analysis approach, which uses both numerical and visualization techniques to examine the extant literature from 2003 – 2022. The outcomes of the scientific bibliographic coupling identified three dominant themes: (i) Greenwashing (exaggeration of green effort); (ii) ESG disclosures and performance gap and (iii); Communicative legitimation strategies and reporting of negative aspects. Results highlighted overlaps and differences between G7 and non-G7 countries, and the need for further research in non-G7 countries on the institutional, cultural, and socioeconomic variances on greenwashing, firm-level variations in behavior, leadership and strategy on greenwashing, the use of technology in detecting greenwashing, as well as the role of regulatory and governance in corporate reporting to mitigate greenwashing. This study hopes to attract the attention of researchers, policymakers, and businesses to counteract greenwashing by recognizing its determinants and contribute to the quality and credibility of sustainability reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheela Sundarasen & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak & Sanjay Goel, 2024. "Sustainability reporting and greenwashing: a bibliometrics assessment in G7 and non-G7 nations," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2320812-232, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2320812
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2320812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2320812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2320812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2320812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.