IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i1p2163094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is related party transactions linked to accounting comparability? Evidence from emerging market

Author

Listed:
  • Phung Anh Thu
  • Pham Quang Huy
  • Le Huu Tuan Anh

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the relationship between related party transaction (RPT) and accounting comparability (AIC). In this study, the authors use a generalized method of moments (GMM) method to assess the RPT-AIC association by using a sample of 441 non-financial companies in Vietnam for the period 2015–2019. Using the monetary scale to measure the size of the kinds of RPT transactions, the authors find evidence for a positive relation between RPT and AIC. Besides, our results are confirmed through different robustness tests by applying different ways of measurement for RPT and AIC. This study provides valuable empirical evidence about the relationship between RPT and AIC through the research context of an emerging market like Vietnam. This is the first study to diversify the research context in the developing country to answer whether the impact of RPT on business is context-based or global.

Suggested Citation

  • Phung Anh Thu & Pham Quang Huy & Le Huu Tuan Anh, 2023. "Is related party transactions linked to accounting comparability? Evidence from emerging market," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2163094-216, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2163094
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2163094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2163094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2163094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2163094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.