Omitted productivity data: Why haven't economic reforms increased productivity growth in New Zealand?
Crucial data on productivity was omitted from my article titled, “Why Haven't Economic Reforms Increased Productivity Growth in New Zealand?. The data consist of GDP per hour and real earnings per hour as two alternative measures of productivity. More importantly, they are crucial to substantiate the premise of the “productivity puzzle” that the article addresses and represent an alternative source of productivity data that the growth economists in New Zealand typically ignore. Instead, they rely on artificially constructed data on total factor productivity (TFP). However, when it comes to the TFP data the art of construction varies widely. Consequently, economists in New Zealand also struggle to gather consensus on how to interpret those data. In the above paper I argue that such a consensus would be impossible to achieve since the interpretation of the TFP data crucially depends on the specific model that one uses. The data on GDP per hour or real earnings per hour, however, raise far less controversy when one attempts to interpret them in wide varieties of models. Moreover, contrary to the widely held optimism among the policymakers regarding post-reform productivity growth, those less controversial data reveal a puzzling drop in the decade long average productivity growth, following the economic reforms of the late 1980s. My paper published in the December 2004 issue of the NZEP provides an explanation of the puzzle in a neoclassical growth theoretic framework. However, because of the unfortunate omission of the crucial productivity data several economists have questioned my premise of any decline in the trend growth rate of productivity. I have responded to those people who contacted me directly regarding those missing data. However, a widespread use of various types of TFP data that do not capture the puzzle of post reform decline in productivity growth calls for the publication of the omitted data. I hope that future research involving this alternative dataset on productivity would benefit the policy makers by providing a less ambiguous picture of the trend in productivity growth in New Zealand.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 39 (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RNZP20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RNZP20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:39:y:2005:i:1:p:105-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.