IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mpopst/v32y2025i4p243-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representativity evaluation of sample micro-records in population censuses based on IPUMS database

Author

Listed:
  • Yinshuang Dong
  • Guihua Hu
  • David López-Carr

Abstract

Many demographers use samples of micro-records from population censuses for direct statistical analysis. If the sample lacks representativity, the resulting analysis may lead to invalid conclusions. It is necessary to evaluate the sample’s representativity before conducting any analytical analysis. Data comparison and sampling variance are the two main methods of assessing the representativity of samples. Studies show that the selection of sampling method should be on the basis of the needs of the researcher; under stratified double sampling, the linear estimator and ratio estimator estimating the numbers of men and women can be combined into a synthetic estimator; using actual data, the calculated sampling variance is relatively small, and the confidence intervals include parameter values, so the representativity of the sub-samples is high. A complete theoretical framework for evaluating the sample’s representativity of the census micro-records is established. It helps demographers master the method of evaluating sample representativity and draw correct conclusions from demographic analysis. The proposed sample representativity evaluation methods are not only suitable for the micro-records of population census but also for those of agricultural and economic censuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinshuang Dong & Guihua Hu & David López-Carr, 2025. "Representativity evaluation of sample micro-records in population censuses based on IPUMS database," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 243-264, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:243-264
    DOI: 10.1080/08898480.2025.2533220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08898480.2025.2533220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08898480.2025.2533220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:243-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GMPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.