IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v53y2026i1p70-92.html

Impact of imputation methods for ship technical parameters on emission estimations in ports

Author

Listed:
  • Ruikai Sun
  • Wessam Abouarghoub
  • Emrah Demir
  • Andrew Potter

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from ships have emerged as a pressing concern. Nevertheless, the quality of data in existing databases remains inadequate, with numerous instances of missing information. This presents significant challenges for accurately estimating emissions associated with ship activities in port. This paper uses three imputation methods and applies them to three ports as a case study to evaluate their performance in emission estimation. The mixed-method demonstrates high accuracy while covering nearly all cases of missing data, resulting in the smallest error in estimating daily emissions. The results indicate that if the data quality is not improved, at least 12% of CO2 emissions may be underestimated. The cases of missing data that the imputation model can address also have a significant impact. For example, the multiple linear regression method, which only covers partial cases of missing data, leads to an underestimation of emissions by 2% to 6%. The findings highlight that an appropriate imputation method can significantly improve the accuracy of emission estimation. They also highlight the importance of data quality, which not only reduces estimation errors but also helps prevent the substantial underestimation of emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruikai Sun & Wessam Abouarghoub & Emrah Demir & Andrew Potter, 2026. "Impact of imputation methods for ship technical parameters on emission estimations in ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 70-92, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:70-92
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2025.2463635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2025.2463635
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2025.2463635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:70-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.