IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v52y2025i5p781-805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritizing port resilience drivers and strategies: a case study of Chilean ports

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando González-Solano
  • Gina Galindo
  • Rosa G. González-Ramírez
  • Héctor López-Ospina
  • Daniel Romero-Rodriguez

Abstract

Disruptive events increasingly challenge global port operations and infrastructure, emphasizing the need for robust resilience plans to maintain operational continuity during crises. Designing effective resilience strategies in port operations involves prioritizing key drivers and strategies by establishing a hierarchical structure and analyzing their systemic interactions. This paper proposes a methodology to prioritize resilience drivers with its strategies by considering multiple key port stakeholders. This approach aims to create a roadmap for implementing these drivers, providing ports with a comprehensive tool for planning and executing resilience strategies. The methodology integrates the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) with Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM). To illustrate its development, a case study focusing on two primary stakeholders, terminals and port authorities, in the Chilean port context is presented. The findings reveal that the main resilience strategies in Chilean ports include remote access to information by port authorities, alternative transport modes for port access and exit, rescheduling dispatches and cargo reception by port terminals, communication and call chains of the port authority, and remote access to information by port terminals. These results offer practical implications for port operations, providing clear guidance for implementing resilience strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando González-Solano & Gina Galindo & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Héctor López-Ospina & Daniel Romero-Rodriguez, 2025. "Prioritizing port resilience drivers and strategies: a case study of Chilean ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 781-805, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:781-805
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2024.2409242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2024.2409242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2024.2409242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:781-805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.