IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v49y2022i6p897-912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordinated approaches for port state control inspection planning

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Yan
  • Shuaian Wang
  • Kjetil Fagerholt

Abstract

Port state control (PSC) inspections serve to guard maritime safety and the marine environment. Because port inspection resources are limited, inspection efficiency can be improved if the resources are scheduled more efficiently. Currently, ports worldwide apply a greedy inspection strategy. To improve inspection efficiency, this study proposes two coordinated inspection strategies for both liner and tramp ships, i.e., a self-coordinated port strategy and a fully coordinated central agent strategy. Extensive numerical experiments indicate that on average the self-coordinated port strategy performs 2.48% better than the greedy strategy, and the fully coordinated strategy outperforms the greedy and self-coordinated port strategies by 5.02% and 2.48%, respectively. The superiority of the two coordinated strategies is robust to different ratios of liner to tramp ships visiting the ports from 0/100 to 100/0. Therefore, the feasibility and wide applicability of the proposed coordinated strategies are validated. Specifically, when liner ships outnumber tramp ships, the fully coordinated strategy is more suitable; otherwise, both the self-coordinated port strategy and the fully coordinated strategy can be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Yan & Shuaian Wang & Kjetil Fagerholt, 2022. "Coordinated approaches for port state control inspection planning," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 897-912, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:897-912
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2021.1903599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903599
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:897-912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.