IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/macfem/v11y2018i3p290-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permanent productivity shocks, migration and the labour wedge: business cycles in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoya Suzuki

Abstract

The findings of this study are as follows. First, permanent productivity shocks play a dominant role in South African business cycles. Second, the migration outflow has a negative effect on permanent productivity shocks. Third, a labour wedge that represents labour market inefficiency is significant in South Africa. Fourth, the labour wedge has a positive effect on the migration outflow. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that labour market inefficiency in South Africa pushes workers out of the country and permanently influences the country’s labour effectiveness, thereby driving South African business cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoya Suzuki, 2018. "Permanent productivity shocks, migration and the labour wedge: business cycles in South Africa," Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 290-303, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:macfem:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:290-303
    DOI: 10.1080/17520843.2018.1451352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17520843.2018.1451352
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17520843.2018.1451352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pham, Binh Thai & Sala, Hector & Silva, José I., 2020. "Growth and real business cycles in Vietnam and the Asean-5. Does the trend shock matter?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    2. repec:rbz:oboens:11029 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:macfem:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:290-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.