IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v55y2026i3p911-932.html

RUL prediction based on a two-phase random volatility inverse Gaussian process

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-ying Liang
  • Zai-zai Yan
  • Li-jun Sun

Abstract

To address the phased-depended and random characteristics exhibited by products along their degradation process, this paper proposes a novel degradation modeling and reliability analysis method based on a two-phase Random Volatility Inverse Gaussian (RV-IG) process. Firstly, the Schwarz Information Criterion (SIC) is employed to identify change points in the product’s degradation trajectory. Secondly, parameter estimation is conducted through a hybrid approach of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and Gibbs sampling algorithm. Then, to tackle the analytical challenges of reliability assessment for the two-phase random IG degradation process, statistical inference of the remaining useful life (RUL) for the constructed model is performed using convolution formulas and Bayesian algorithms. Finally, the proposed model is validated through simulation and a real-world case study involving train wheels degradation. The results demonstrate that the constructed model outperforms, traditional single-phased and fixed effects degradation models in terms of reliability predictions accuracy, thereby better aligning with engineering practice needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-ying Liang & Zai-zai Yan & Li-jun Sun, 2026. "RUL prediction based on a two-phase random volatility inverse Gaussian process," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 911-932, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:55:y:2026:i:3:p:911-932
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2025.2509718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2025.2509718
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2025.2509718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:55:y:2026:i:3:p:911-932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.