IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v55y2026i18p6237-6261.html

Closed-form estimation of two randomly missing observations in non-replicated two-way factorial experiments (MultiMiss2)

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron C. Marshall
  • Shaha A. Patwary
  • Kumer P. Das

Abstract

This study introduced MultiMiss2, a novel closed-form methodology for estimating two randomly missing observations in non-replicated two-way factorial experiments. By minimizing the squared error loss (L2-norm), the approach provides analytic estimators that consistently demonstrated reduced bias, variance, mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE) as replications increased. Sensitivity analyses confirmed its robustness, with numerical optimizations converging to analytic solutions across all scenarios. Comparative benchmarking against established imputation methods (Mice, Amelia, MissForest, and Hmisc) showed that, while these approaches performed adequately in multivariate contexts, they were less suited for factorial designs. In contrast, MultiMiss2 consistently yielded smaller centered squared error loss, SSE, offering more accurate and reliable estimates. Although limited by the inability to estimate interaction effects in non-replicated designs, this methodology marks a significant step forward in factorial data analysis. Future work will extend the framework to handle more missing values, replicated designs, and higher-order factorial structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron C. Marshall & Shaha A. Patwary & Kumer P. Das, 2026. "Closed-form estimation of two randomly missing observations in non-replicated two-way factorial experiments (MultiMiss2)," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 6237-6261, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:55:y:2026:i:18:p:6237-6261
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2026.2663488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2026.2663488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2026.2663488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:55:y:2026:i:18:p:6237-6261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.