IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i17p5470-5479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample size estimation for the ratio of count outcomes in a cluster randomized trial using GEE

Author

Listed:
  • Jijia Wang
  • Song Zhang
  • Chul Ahn

Abstract

Count outcomes often occur in cluster randomized trials. Particularly in the context of epidemiology, the ratio of incidence rates has been used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention. In practice, cluster sizes typically vary across clusters, and sample size estimation based on a constant cluster size assumption may lead to underpowered studies. To address this issue, we propose a sample size method based on the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach to test the ratio of two incidence rates. A closed–form sample size formula is presented, which is flexible to account for unbalanced randomization and randomly varying cluster sizes. Simulations were performed to assess its performance. In cluster randomized trials of vaccine efficacy, the ratio of disease incidence rates has been frequently used to demonstrate that the vaccine reduces the occurrence of a disease compared to placebo or active control. An application example to the design of a vaccine efficacy cluster randomized trial is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Jijia Wang & Song Zhang & Chul Ahn, 2025. "Sample size estimation for the ratio of count outcomes in a cluster randomized trial using GEE," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5470-5479, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:17:p:5470-5479
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2439998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2439998
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2439998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:17:p:5470-5479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.