IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i16p5231-5244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of proposed quantitative randomized response model

Author

Listed:
  • Ghulam Narjis
  • Javid Shabbir

Abstract

In this study, a mixed quantitative randomized response (RR) model has been proposed for estimating the population mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of scrambled response under simple random sampling. The properties of proposed model are described and verified its theoretical results with empirical analysis. An impartial comparison of proposed mixed quantitative randomized response model with some existing additive, multiplicative, and mixed quantitative models are made. The model efficiency and privacy are considered in comparison, the finding suggests that proposed RR model perform better than some existing models in term of efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghulam Narjis & Javid Shabbir, 2025. "A comparative analysis of proposed quantitative randomized response model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 5231-5244, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:16:p:5231-5244
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2434942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2434942
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2434942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:16:p:5231-5244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.