IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i13p4083-4100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A goodness-of-fit measure for logistic regression under separation

Author

Listed:
  • Naoki Kotani
  • Takeshi Kurosawa
  • Nobuoki Eshima

Abstract

Logistic regression models have a severe problem called separation. The maximum likelihood estimator does not exist in logistic regression models for data structures under separation. Under separation, the forcibly estimated maximum likelihood estimate may have an extremely large value. Separation often occurs when the size of dataset is small. Consequently, goodness-of-fit measures based on the likelihood ratio and those based on covariance functions using the maximum likelihood estimate indicate that the model is excessively good regardless of the cause of the separation. The Firth and exact logistic regression methods are valid estimation methods for separation problems. Therefore, we propose methods to reasonably evaluate the goodness-of-fit measures of statistical models under separation with dataset of a small sample size with the abovementioned methods. The goodness-of-fit measures based on covariance functions which are a generalization of the multiple correlation coefficient, referred to as the regression correlation coefficient and the entropy coefficient of determination are then used combined with the abovementioned methods for the separation data. In addition, we conducted a data analysis using the definition of the non separation ratio based on the regression depth.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoki Kotani & Takeshi Kurosawa & Nobuoki Eshima, 2025. "A goodness-of-fit measure for logistic regression under separation," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 4083-4100, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:13:p:4083-4100
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2413845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2413845
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2413845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:13:p:4083-4100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.