IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i8p2646-2665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A product acceptance decision-making method based on process capability with considering gauge measurement errors

Author

Listed:
  • Dwi Yuli Rakhmawati
  • Junghye Lee

Abstract

An acceptance sampling plan is an essential technique for quality assurance in manufacturing industries to help producers and buyers make appropriate decisions regarding many products. By providing the required sample sizes and critical value, the plan streamlines the quality standards process. The recent attention paid to acceptance sampling plans has tended to emphasize the process capability index while neglecting gauge measurement errors (GMEs), which have a direct impact on the fraction of defectives and decision-making processes to be the detriment of stakeholders. Thus, we provide the required sample size and the critical acceptance value considering GMEs. To demonstrate the impact of GMEs on the assessment of a product’s lot, we present a real case study on a bilateral switch. Information on the required number of samples for the inspection and the acceptance critical value will help lead to a reliable decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwi Yuli Rakhmawati & Junghye Lee, 2023. "A product acceptance decision-making method based on process capability with considering gauge measurement errors," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 2646-2665, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:8:p:2646-2665
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1955929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1955929
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1955929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:8:p:2646-2665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.