IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i8p2482-2492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new standardized mortality ratio method for hospital quality evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Peng
  • Xin Lai
  • Liu Liu
  • Jing Chen

Abstract

Evaluation of hospital quality is of great significance for the promotion of the development of medical care. Hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR) is the ratio of hospital observed mortality to expected mortality (O/E ratio) and is an important indicator for the evaluation of hospital performance. Given the importance of HSMR, accurate estimation of HSMR confidence intervals is essential. All existing methods assume that the distributions of the O/E ratios are close to a normal distribution. However, this assumption is not reasonable. In this article, we propose a new method for calculating the HSMR confidence intervals. We derive the confidence intervals for the O/E ratios by calculating the confidence intervals of log(O/E). Then, we use the coverage probability of the confidence intervals to compare the performance of our method with the performance of existing methods. In the scenarios with different true relative risks, if the mortality rate is less than or equal to 1%, the bias of our method is substantially lower than that of the existing methods. The simulation results show that our method provides a more accurate estimate of the confidence intervals of the O/E ratios in the case of low mortality rates than that provided by the existing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Peng & Xin Lai & Liu Liu & Jing Chen, 2023. "A new standardized mortality ratio method for hospital quality evaluation," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 2482-2492, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:8:p:2482-2492
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1955381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1955381
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1955381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:8:p:2482-2492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.