IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i18p6561-6572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graphical evaluation of prediction capability when the number of noise variable increases in robust parameter design

Author

Listed:
  • Jin H. Oh

Abstract

The goal of robust parameter design is to identify settings of the control variables that are robust or insensitive to variability transmitted from the noise variables. By developing a model containing both the noise and the control variables, a combination of control variable settings can be determined, so that the response is robust to changes in the noise variables. As a result, robust parameter design entails designing the system to achieve robustness or insensitivity to the inevitable changes in the noise variables. From this viewpoint, we consider the cases where the control factor in robust parameter designs has a large number of noise factors. In this article, it is of interest in establishing a graphical evaluation for assessing prediction capability by extending the scaled prediction variance concerning the increased number of noise variables for representative robust parameter designs such as a modified central composite design, a modified small composite design, and a composite mixed resolution design. Additionally, we identify which design is highly performative or desirable concerning the variability in the noise variables themselves and the variability transmitted by these noise variables in the three designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin H. Oh, 2023. "Graphical evaluation of prediction capability when the number of noise variable increases in robust parameter design," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(18), pages 6561-6572, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:18:p:6561-6572
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2032166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2032166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2032166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:18:p:6561-6572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.