IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i18p6542-6560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing minimum aberration split-plot designs via complementary designs when the subplot factors are more important

Author

Listed:
  • Hui-Ping Dang
  • Sheng-Li Zhao
  • Qian-Qian Zhao

Abstract

Robust parameter design (RPD) is a statistical engineering method for reducing the sensitivity of a system (i.e., a product or process) to noise variations by selecting a treatment combination of control factors, with the aim of reducing performance fluctuations of the system. Then the control factors are more important in RPD. The fractional factorial split-plot (FFSP) designs can be used when the noise and control factors are considered as the whole plot (WP) factors and subplot (SP) factors respectively in the design. Based on the above situation, this paper considers the FFSP design when the SP factors are more important. A criterion called minimum aberration of type SP (SP-MA) is proposed and the SP-MA FFSP designs are constructed by using complementary designs. The superiority of the SP-MA criterion in seeking FFSP designs when the SP factors are more important than the WP factors is illustrated by comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui-Ping Dang & Sheng-Li Zhao & Qian-Qian Zhao, 2023. "Constructing minimum aberration split-plot designs via complementary designs when the subplot factors are more important," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(18), pages 6542-6560, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:18:p:6542-6560
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2031221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2031221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2031221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:18:p:6542-6560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.