IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i15p5349-5363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness of definitive screening composite designs to missing observations

Author

Listed:
  • Abimbola V. Oladugba
  • Ogechukwu C. Nwanonobi

Abstract

Missing observations are unavoidable in most experimental situation and it is necessary to develop efficient designs that could keep the effect of the missing observations as minimal as possible. In this paper, based on definitive screening composite designs (DSCDs) of Zhou and Xu (Journal of the American Statistical Association 112 (520):1675–83, 2017), definitive screening minimax loss designs denoted by DSCMDs are constructed, which are more robust to one missing design point. These newly constructed designs were compared with some existing composite designs (central composite designs (CCDs), orthogonal array composite designs (OACDs), orthogonal array composite minimax loss designs (OACMs), definitive screening composite designs (DSCDs)) used for estimating the parameters of a second order model, in terms of the D-efficiency and generalized scaled standard deviation. The results showed that the DSCMDs are more robust to missing observation than the existing composite designs considered in this paper when compared in of terms of the D-efficiency and generalized scaled standard deviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Abimbola V. Oladugba & Ogechukwu C. Nwanonobi, 2023. "Robustness of definitive screening composite designs to missing observations," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(15), pages 5349-5363, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:15:p:5349-5363
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.2006715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.2006715
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.2006715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:15:p:5349-5363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.