IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i12p4369-4378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relating the Friedman test adjusted for ties, the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel mean score test and the ANOVA F test

Author

Listed:
  • J. C. W. Rayner
  • Glen Livingston

Abstract

The Friedman test is used to nonparametrically test the null hypothesis of equality of the treatment distributions in the randomized block design. The simple form of the test statistic is for data that is untied within blocks. When ties occur and mid-ranks are used, an adjustment to the simple form of the test statistic is needed. Here such adjustments are given, and it is shown that the Friedman tests, both with untied rank data and with tied data using mid-ranks, are Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel mean score tests. Additionally, for the randomized block design, the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel mean score statistic is shown to be a simple function of the ANOVA F statistic. Using this relationship for the Friedman tests is shown to give more accurate p-values close to the nominal significance level. Moreover, since the ANOVA F test null hypothesis specifies equality of mean treatment ranks, so does the Friedman test. Therefore the null hypothesis of the Friedman test is sharper than equality of the treatment distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • J. C. W. Rayner & Glen Livingston, 2023. "Relating the Friedman test adjusted for ties, the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel mean score test and the ANOVA F test," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 4369-4378, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:12:p:4369-4378
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1994606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1994606
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1994606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:12:p:4369-4378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.