IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i12p4216-4228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalized normal scores test that increases the power of a test of significance for a coefficient in a linear model

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas W. O’Gorman

Abstract

A generalization of the normal scores two-sample test is proposed. The empirical significance level of this test closely approximates the nominal level of significance and it is often more powerful than the traditional t test for a test of any single coefficient in a linear model. Based on an extensive simulation study we found that, for most applications, the generalized normal scores test maintains its level of significance and it has, for data sets having 50 or more observations, greater power than the t test if the distribution of the errors is long-tailed or skewed. But, we found that the empirical significance level slightly exceeds the nominal level for regression models having covariates that are skewed and highly correlated, and for those models the generalized normal scores test is not recommended. If a data set has fewer than 50 observations the generalized normal scores test is not recommended because for most error distributions it does not offer an increase in power over the t test. However, if the number of observations equals or exceeds 50 and the covariates are not highly correlated this generalized normal scores test can be used to increase the power of tests of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas W. O’Gorman, 2023. "A generalized normal scores test that increases the power of a test of significance for a coefficient in a linear model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 4216-4228, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:12:p:4216-4228
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1987471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1987471
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1987471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:12:p:4216-4228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.