IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i10p3429-3451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimax randomized response methods for protecting respondent’s privacy

Author

Listed:
  • Jichong Chai
  • Tapan K. Nayak

Abstract

Randomized response (RR) is a common privacy protection tool. It perturbs each true response using a probabilistic mechanism. Local differential privacy (LDP) is a rigorous privacy protection criterion that demands a guarantee that no intruder will get much new information about any respondent’s true value from its perturbed value. Considering linear unbiased estimation of multinomial probabilities under LDP and squared error loss, we derive minimax RR methods. We address optimal choices for both the RR mechanism (or design) and the estimator. Our minimax design has a particular structure, which is used to define t-subset designs. We describe and study properties of t-subset designs including their practical implementation. We also study mixtures of t-subset designs and examine the RAPPOR method, which is used notably by Google and Apple. We note inadmissibility of the RAPPOR design and offer some suggestions for improving both the design and the customary estimator.

Suggested Citation

  • Jichong Chai & Tapan K. Nayak, 2023. "Minimax randomized response methods for protecting respondent’s privacy," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(10), pages 3429-3451, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:10:p:3429-3451
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1973503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1973503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1973503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:10:p:3429-3451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.