IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i9p2858-2869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developed cosine similarity measure on belief function theory: An application in medical diagnosis

Author

Listed:
  • Fereshteh Khalaj
  • Mehran Khalaj

Abstract

In this study, we consider a new aspect of belief function or Dempster-Shafer theory to define a belief set and cosine similarity measure between two belief sets under uncertainty. For this purpose, firstly, the concept of belief sets will be represented as a triple vector space that is characterized by truth-belief degree, uncertainty-belief degree; and falsity-belief degree. Then, the cosine similarity measure between two belief sets is proposed to determine the degree of similarity between them. This measure is directly defined upon the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory without switching by other theories. Finally, an application of a new method in the decision-making process is provided in the medical diagnosis, when values were presented on the structure of belief set. Furthermore, a numerical example of the medical diagnosis is presented to show the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Fereshteh Khalaj & Mehran Khalaj, 2022. "Developed cosine similarity measure on belief function theory: An application in medical diagnosis," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(9), pages 2858-2869, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:9:p:2858-2869
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1782935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1782935
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1782935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:9:p:2858-2869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.