IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i24p8754-8775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robustness evaluation of Bayesian tests for longitudinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Arnroth
  • Rauf Ahmad

Abstract

Linear mixed models are standard models to analyze repeated measures or longitudinal data under the assumption of normality for random components in the model. Although the mixed models are often used in both frequentist and Bayesian inference, their evaluation from robustness perspective has not received as much attention in Bayesian inference as in frequentist. The aim of this study is to evaluate Bayesian tests in mixed models for their robustness to normality. We use a general class of exponential power distributions, EPD, and particularly focus on testing fixed effects in longitudinal models. The EPD class contains both light and heavy tailed distributions, with normality as a special case. Further, we consider a new paradigm of Bayesian testing decision theory where the hypotheses are formulated as a mixture model, with subsequent testing based on the posterior distribution of the mixture weights. It is shown that the EPD class provides a flexible alternative to normality assumption, particularly in the presence of outliers. Real data applications are also demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Arnroth & Rauf Ahmad, 2022. "A robustness evaluation of Bayesian tests for longitudinal data," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 8754-8775, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:24:p:8754-8775
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1906432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1906432
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1906432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:24:p:8754-8775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.