IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i23p8264-8282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the fit of relational models

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Klimova
  • Tamás Rudas

Abstract

Relational models generalize log-linear models to arbitrary discrete sample spaces by specifying effects associated with any subsets of their cells. A relational model may include an overall effect, pertaining to every cell after a reparameterization, and in this case, the properties of the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) are analogous to those computed under traditional log-linear models, and the goodness-of-fit tests are also the same. If an overall effect is not present in any reparameterization, the properties of the MLEs are considerably different, and the Poisson and multinomial MLEs are not equivalent. In the Poisson case, if the overall effect is not present, the observed total is not always preserved by the MLE, and the likelihood ratio statistic has a form which can be expressed using the Bregman divergence but does not reduce to its Kullback–Leibler version. The asymptotic chi-squared distribution of the Pearson and likelihood ratio statistics holds, but the generality considered here requires extended proofs.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Klimova & Tamás Rudas, 2022. "Testing the fit of relational models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(23), pages 8264-8282, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:23:p:8264-8282
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1891437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1891437
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1891437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:23:p:8264-8282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.