IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i16p5681-5691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to analyze change in perception from paired Q-sorts

Author

Listed:
  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh
  • Stephen C. Wingreen

Abstract

Although there have been some previous attempts on analyzing changes in perceptions in Q-methodology, a systematic approach is lacking. In this article we introduce two new methods for analyzing change in perceptions in Q-methodology using paired Q-sorts. We also demonstrate these methods using an actual dataset.Method I: This approach is appropriate for assessing the changes in perceptions between two different conditions of instruction applied to the same subjects. The changes are assessed using a factor analysis on the differences between the Q-sorts from the two conditions of instruction.Method II: This method examines the changes in perception from a baseline Q-analysis. This is usually appropriate when data are collected at two time-points, e.g., before-after situations, where the first assessment is considered as the baseline. In this approach, a by-person factor analysis is conducted on the baseline Q-sorts (condition 1) and factors are identified. Then, the changes in perceptions are assessed for the subjects loaded on any factor from baseline using the Q-sorts from condition 2.In conclusion, these two methods are easy to apply, the results are more objective, and are less prone to investigator bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh & Stephen C. Wingreen, 2022. "How to analyze change in perception from paired Q-sorts," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(16), pages 5681-5691, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:16:p:5681-5691
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1845734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1845734
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1845734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:16:p:5681-5691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.