IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i15p5284-5297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An EM algorithm for analyzing right-censored survival data under the semiparametric proportional odds model

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Wang
  • Lianming Wang

Abstract

The semiparametric proportional odds (PO) model is a popular alternative to Cox’s proportional hazards model for analyzing survival data. Although many approaches have been proposed for this topic in the literature, most of the existing approaches have been found computationally expensive and difficult to implement. In this article, a novel and easy-to-implement approach based on an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is proposed for analyzing right-censored data. The EM algorithm involves only solving a low-dimensional estimating equation for the regression parameters and then updating the spline coefficients in simple closed form at each iteration. Our method is robust to initial values, converges fast, and provides the variance estimates in closed form. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed method has excellent performance in estimating both regression parameters and the baseline survival function, even when the right censoring rate is very high. The method is applied to a large dataset about breast cancer survival extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database maintained by the U.S. National Cancer Institute. This method is now available in R package regPOr for public use.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Wang & Lianming Wang, 2022. "An EM algorithm for analyzing right-censored survival data under the semiparametric proportional odds model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(15), pages 5284-5297, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:15:p:5284-5297
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1837879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1837879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1837879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:15:p:5284-5297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.