IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i10p3419-3433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A revisit to Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic for comparing two predictive values

Author

Listed:
  • Yougui Wu

Abstract

Bennett (Statistics in Medicine 4 (1985), 535-539) proposed a goodness-of-fit statistic to compare two predictive values in an attempt to improve upon its earlier version he derived in 1976. However, this new version of Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic was not presented correctly, and more importantly, its validity has been questioned by several authors in the literature as it did not involve the disease prevalence, a part of the two Predictive Values to be compared. To shed some light on this classical test statistic, in this paper, we first obtain the corrected version of Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic. We then compare the corrected version with its recent Wald counterpart proposed by Wang (Statistics in Medicine 25(2006), 2215-2229) and show that the two statistics are asymptotically equivalent. The validity of the corrected Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic is further supported by a simulation study which indicates that Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic with correction has similar finite sample performance to its Wald counterpart. In conclusion, the corrected Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic is a competitive statistic for testing equality of two predictive values.

Suggested Citation

  • Yougui Wu, 2022. "A revisit to Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic for comparing two predictive values," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(10), pages 3419-3433, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:10:p:3419-3433
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1982987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1982987
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1982987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:10:p:3419-3433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.