IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v50y2021i13p3214-3233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood-based inference in censored exponential regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco M. C. Medeiros
  • Artur J. Lemonte

Abstract

This paper deals with the issue of testing hypotheses in the censored exponential regression model in small and moderate-sized samples. We focus on four tests, namely the Wald, likelihood ratio, score, and gradient tests. These tests rely on asymptotic results and are unreliable when the sample size is not large enough to guarantee a good agreement between the exact distribution of the test statistic under a null hypothesis and the corresponding reference chi-squared asymptotic distribution. Bartlett and Bartlett-type corrections typically attenuate the size distortion of the tests. These corrections are available in the literature for the likelihood ratio and score tests in the class of censored exponential regression models. A Bartlett-type correction for the gradient test is derived in this paper in this class of models. Additionally, we also propose bootstrap-based inferential improvements to the four tests mentioned. We numerically compare the tests through extensive Monte Carlo simulation experiments. The numerical results reveal that the corrected and bootstrapped tests exhibit type I error probability closer to the chosen nominal level with virtually no power loss. We also present an empirical application for illustrative purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco M. C. Medeiros & Artur J. Lemonte, 2021. "Likelihood-based inference in censored exponential regression models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 3214-3233, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:13:p:3214-3233
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1700281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2019.1700281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2019.1700281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:13:p:3214-3233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.