IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i5p1181-1203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increased Fisher’s information for parameters of association in count regression via extreme ranks

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel F. Linder
  • Jingjing Yin
  • Haresh Rochani
  • Hani Samawi
  • Sanjay Sethi

Abstract

The article details a sampling scheme which can lead to a reduction in sample size and cost in clinical and epidemiological studies of association between a count outcome and risk factor. We show that inference in two common generalized linear models for count data, Poisson and negative binomial regression, is improved by using a ranked auxiliary covariate, which guides the sampling procedure. This type of sampling has typically been used to improve inference on a population mean. The novelty of the current work is its extension to log-linear models and derivations showing that the sampling technique results in an increase in information as compared to simple random sampling. Specifically, we show that under the proposed sampling strategy the maximum likelihood estimate of the risk factor’s coefficient is improved through an increase in the Fisher’s information. A simulation study is performed to compare the mean squared error, bias, variance, and power of the sampling routine with simple random sampling under various data-generating scenarios. We also illustrate the merits of the sampling scheme on a real data set from a clinical setting of males with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Empirical results from the simulation study and data analysis coincide with the theoretical derivations, suggesting that a significant reduction in sample size, and hence study cost, can be realized while achieving the same precision as a simple random sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel F. Linder & Jingjing Yin & Haresh Rochani & Hani Samawi & Sanjay Sethi, 2018. "Increased Fisher’s information for parameters of association in count regression via extreme ranks," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 1181-1203, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:5:p:1181-1203
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1316859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1316859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1316859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:5:p:1181-1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.