IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i3p601-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival Weibull regression model for mismeasured outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Magda C. Pires
  • Enrico A. Colosimo
  • Arlaine A. Silva

Abstract

In some survival studies, the exact time of the event of interest is unknown, but the event is known to have occurred during a particular period of time (interval-censored data). If the diagnostic tool used to detect the event of interest is not perfectly sensitive and specific, outcomes may be mismeasured; a healthy subject may be diagnosed as sick and a sick one may be diagnosed as healthy. In such cases, traditional survival analysis methods produce biased estimates for the time-to-failure distribution parameters (Paggiaro and Torelli 2004). In this context, we developed a parametric model that incorporates sensitivity and specificity into a grouped survival data analysis (a case of interval-censored data in which all subjects are tested at the same predetermined time points). Inferential aspects and properties of the methodology, such as the likelihood function and identifiability, are discussed in this article. Assuming known and non differential misclassification, Monte Carlo simulations showed that the proposed model performed well in the case of mismeasured outcomes; the estimates of the relative bias of the model were lower than those provided by the naive method that assumes perfect sensitivity and specificity. The proposed methodology is illustrated by a study related to mango tree lifetimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Magda C. Pires & Enrico A. Colosimo & Arlaine A. Silva, 2018. "Survival Weibull regression model for mismeasured outcomes," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 601-614, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:3:p:601-614
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1309434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1309434
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1309434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:3:p:601-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.