IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i24p5916-5933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian blinded sample size re-estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Sobel
  • Ibrahim Turkoz

Abstract

Information before unblinding regarding the success of confirmatory clinical trials is highly uncertain. Current techniques using point estimates of auxiliary parameters for estimating expected blinded sample size: (i) fail to describe the range of likely sample sizes obtained after the anticipated data are observed, and (ii) fail to adjust to the changing patient population. Sequential MCMC-based algorithms are implemented for purposes of sample size adjustments. The uncertainty arising from clinical trials is characterized by filtering later auxiliary parameters through their earlier counterparts and employing posterior distributions to estimate sample size and power. The use of approximate expected power estimates to determine the required additional sample size are closely related to techniques employing Simple Adjustments or the EM algorithm. By contrast with these, our proposed methodology provides intervals for the expected sample size using the posterior distribution of auxiliary parameters. Future decisions about additional subjects are better informed due to our ability to account for subject response heterogeneity over time. We apply the proposed methodologies to a depression trial. Our proposed blinded procedures should be considered for most studies due to ease of implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Sobel & Ibrahim Turkoz, 2018. "Bayesian blinded sample size re-estimation," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(24), pages 5916-5933, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:24:p:5916-5933
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1404097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1404097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1404097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:24:p:5916-5933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.