IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i18p4590-4608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New measures of statistical performance of process control charts

Author

Listed:
  • George Nenes

Abstract

Traditional measures of statistical performance of SPC control charts are widely used to evaluate the performance of a control chart. Pretty often, even if the control chart is designed from an economic point of view, statistical properties are set as necessary conditions (constraints), to control performance. The usual statistical measure used to evaluate the performance of a chart is either the false alarm rate, α, or the equivalent average run length, ARL0. Usually, the condition is that α should not exceed 0.27% (probability of false alarm for a Shewhart X‾$\bar{X}$ chart with k = 3), or, that the ARL0 (=1/α), should be no less than 370. This paper revisits the issue of statistical properties of a chart, shows that no α constraint suffices to rationalize the performance of the control procedure, in terms of limiting the false alarms to an acceptable level, and proposes new measures of statistical performance that can be used for most commonly used control charts. In addition, a by-product of the paper is a generic model development that can be used for the computation of statistical (and economic) measures of performance for control charts, even for the more advanced, adaptive control charts.

Suggested Citation

  • George Nenes, 2018. "New measures of statistical performance of process control charts," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(18), pages 4590-4608, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:18:p:4590-4608
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1377255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1377255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1377255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:18:p:4590-4608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.