IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i14p3305-3323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model selection in randomized response techniques for binary responses

Author

Listed:
  • Husam I. Ardah
  • Evrim Oral

Abstract

Randomized response techniques (RRTs) have been proposed in survey sampling literature as a solution to the problem of social desirability bias (SDB) while dealing with sensitive questions. All RRTs reduce the SDB by introducing privacy protection for the respondents, but the variances of the estimates become larger compared with the ones obtained from direct questioning technique (DQT). The success of RRTs heavily depends on the assumption that the variable of interest is in fact sensitive for the population under study. There might be situations, however, where a presumably sensitive question is not considered to be sensitive in some populations, in which case using an RRT instead of the DQT would inflate the variance of the estimates unreasonably. In this study, we propose a two-stage sampling procedure for a binary response, which enables one to accurately estimate both the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic and the probability of cheating in a population. The proposed model allows one to choose between an RRT and the DQT. We support our theoretical results with numerous simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Husam I. Ardah & Evrim Oral, 2018. "Model selection in randomized response techniques for binary responses," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(14), pages 3305-3323, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:14:p:3305-3323
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1353626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1353626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1353626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:14:p:3305-3323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.