IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v47y2018i12p2908-2918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference for proportional hazard model with propensity score

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Lu
  • Dingjiao Cai
  • Luheng Wang
  • Xingwei Tong
  • Huiyun Xiang

Abstract

Since the publication of the seminal paper by Cox (1972), proportional hazard model has become very popular in regression analysis for right censored data. In observational studies, treatment assignment may depend on observed covariates. If these confounding variables are not accounted for properly, the inference based on the Cox proportional hazard model may perform poorly. As shown in Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), under the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption, conditioning on the propensity score yields valid causal effect estimates. Therefore we incorporate the propensity score into the Cox model for causal inference with survival data. We derive the asymptotic property of the maximum partial likelihood estimator when the model is correctly specified. Simulation results show that our method performs quite well for observational data. The approach is applied to a real dataset on the time of readmission of trauma patients. We also derive the asymptotic property of the maximum partial likelihood estimator with a robust variance estimator, when the model is incorrectly specified.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Lu & Dingjiao Cai & Luheng Wang & Xingwei Tong & Huiyun Xiang, 2018. "Inference for proportional hazard model with propensity score," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(12), pages 2908-2918, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:12:p:2908-2918
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1343849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1343849
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2017.1343849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:12:p:2908-2918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.