IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v45y2016i24p7130-7160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some process capability indices for unilateral specification limits—Their properties and the process capability control charts

Author

Listed:
  • Moutushi Chatterjee
  • Ashis Kumar Chakraborty

Abstract

Processes with smaller the better and larger the better types of quality characteristics and consequently the unilateral specification limits are very common in manufacturing industries. However, very little theoretical resources are available in literature, compared to the bilateral specification limits, for assessing the capability of such processes. In the present article, we have studied the expressions for the threshold value and relationship with proportion of non conformance for some of the process capability indices (PCIs) for unilateral specification limits. We have also explored the distributional aspects along with the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators of those PCIs based on both single-sample information as well as the information obtained from the corresponding X‾-R$\overline{X} - R$ and X‾-S$\overline{X} - S$ control charts. The process capability control charts for these PCIs have been designed as well for the purpose of the continuous assessment of the capability of a process over the entire production cycle. Finally, a numerical example has been discussed in the context of the theory developed in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Moutushi Chatterjee & Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, 2016. "Some process capability indices for unilateral specification limits—Their properties and the process capability control charts," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(24), pages 7130-7160, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:24:p:7130-7160
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.978023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2014.978023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2014.978023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:24:p:7130-7160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.