IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v48y2025i13p912-915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foul Ball, Fair Game: How Student-Athlete Responses to Anti-DEI Legislation Serve as a Setting to Test Our Willingness to Act on Public Administration Values

Author

Listed:
  • M. Blair Thomas

Abstract

In March 2024, the University of Florida emerged as one of the most recognizable institutions of higher learning to eliminate funding for DEI programs even as public administration programs seek desperately to stop sinking enrollments. In response, the NAACP encouraged Black student-athletes to reconsider their current and future commitments to public colleges and universities with similar policies. With significant access to social and financial capital, a student-athlete exodus may have major consequences for public administration programs. This commentary highlights how our programs may suffer further enrollment losses if public administration program leaders fail to stand for students by promoting inclusive policies that protect students of color. It concludes with a call to action for all stakeholders to resist the implementation of anti-DEI initiatives and programs that oppose formalized public administration values and to actively stand up against legislation that harms students that we seek to serve.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Blair Thomas, 2025. "Foul Ball, Fair Game: How Student-Athlete Responses to Anti-DEI Legislation Serve as a Setting to Test Our Willingness to Act on Public Administration Values," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(13), pages 912-915, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:48:y:2025:i:13:p:912-915
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2024.2427655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2024.2427655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2024.2427655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:48:y:2025:i:13:p:912-915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.