IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v47y2024i7p452-463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontline Workers’ Use of Discretion in the Implementation of National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi
  • Edward Brenya
  • Adam Fusheini

Abstract

The article examines frontline workers’ use of discretion in the implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana. It answers two questions: 1) how does discretion affect service delivery? 2) Whose interest does discretion serve in service delivery? The article provides three contributions. First, it brings a new direction in the use of discretion in organisations in a developing world context. Second, it adds to ‘how’ and ‘why’ frontline workers use discretion. Finally, it reveals whose interest the use of discretion serves. It utilises qualitative methods to reveal both positively motivated and negatively motivated discretion relationships that exist between frontline workers and clients. Most of the negatively inclined discretion is exercised largely by frontline workers in public organisations. It concludes that most of the frontline workers’ discretion serves the interest of their clients rather than service providers’ self-interest or the interest of their organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi & Edward Brenya & Adam Fusheini, 2024. "Frontline Workers’ Use of Discretion in the Implementation of National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 452-463, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:47:y:2024:i:7:p:452-463
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2022.2145307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2022.2145307
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2022.2145307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:47:y:2024:i:7:p:452-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.