IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v16y2026i1p52-77.html

Motivated to trust? Promotion and prevention focus are distinctly related to the tendency to trust others

Author

Listed:
  • Fanny Lalot
  • Rainer Greifeneder
  • Dominic Abrams

Abstract

The present work brings together perspectives from trust and the self-regulation literature to investigate how people’s regulatory focus, a form of self-regulation and motivational orientation, relates to their generalised trust. Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between two different ways that humans can self-regulate and pursue their goals: a prevention orientation (i.e. greater focus on security, ought goals, and a loss-avoidance mindset) and a promotion orientation (i.e. greater focus on growth, ideal goals, and a gain-approach mindset). People usually show a greater tendency towards one of the two orientations which can be assessed via self-reported questionnaire (often referred to as chronic regulatory focus). A secondary analysis of nine correlational studies, combined in a small-scale meta-analysis (N = 6422), revealed a positive relationship between chronic promotion focus and generalised trust, r = .11, 95% CI [.083, .131] and a significantly larger negative relationship between chronic prevention focus and generalised trust, r = −.22, 95% CI [−.237, −.191]. A second, preregistered study (N = 478) replicated these findings on a measure of self-reported generalised trust and on trusting (cooperative) behaviour in a trust game. The present findings further our understanding of the nomological network of generalised trust. They also expand the theoretical boundaries of regulatory focus theory, highlight distinctions between conceptualisations and measures of regulatory focus, and underscore its implications for understanding the social psychological foundations of trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny Lalot & Rainer Greifeneder & Dominic Abrams, 2026. "Motivated to trust? Promotion and prevention focus are distinctly related to the tendency to trust others," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 52-77, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:52-77
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2025.2486940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2025.2486940
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2025.2486940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:52-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.