IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v15y2025i2p155-177.html

Contextualised vulnerability: recalibrating agency and context in trust research

Author

Listed:
  • Theresia Harrer

Abstract

Although the trust literature provides valuable insights into how vulnerability is experienced and managed, it does so largely through a dyadic relational view. In this view, the trustee’s characteristics and actions are positioned as the primary source of risk, and vulnerability is conceptualised as a relatively static, situational condition. While useful, this paper argues that the dyadic view offers a narrow account of how vulnerability is experienced, overlooking notably the trustors’ broader relational embeddedness. Drawing on Sloterdijk’s Spherology (1998, 1999, 2004), the paper advances a shift to a spherical relational view, emphasising that trustors inhabit multiple overlapping ‘life worlds’ (e.g. work, family, friendships). In this view, a trustor’s vulnerability is shaped not only by the given interaction, but also by prior and ongoing experiences across interconnected relational spheres. Trustors ‘gather’ risk experiences across spheres and merge these into the context with the trustee, forming a spatially grounded (i.e. embodied) and multiplex vulnerability disposition. The paper introduces the concept of contextualised vulnerability to capture this dynamic, situated experience. Doing so, it redefines vulnerability not as a passive condition but as an actively cultivated capacity for trust, offering an embodied understanding of trustor agency and building trust in complex and uncertain environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresia Harrer, 2025. "Contextualised vulnerability: recalibrating agency and context in trust research," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 155-177, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:155-177
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2025.2553511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2025.2553511
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2025.2553511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:155-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.