Author
Listed:
- Paul Shrivastava
- Amr Addas
Abstract
We examine the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability, using the extensive Bloomberg Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) data universe. Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim [2012. The Impact of a Corporate Culture of Sustainability on Corporate Behavior and Performance . National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Papers: 17950] argued that a corporate culture of sustainability plays an important role in various facets of a firm's corporate behaviour and performance. We argue that quality corporate governance itself can engender high sustainability performance. We also build on the work of Aras and Crowther [2008. "Governance and Sustainability: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability." Management Decision 46 (3): 433-448] by investigating the relationship between specific corporate governance and sustainability characteristics of S&P 100 companies in the USA. Our initial exploratory findings suggest that environmental disclosure scores and ESG disclosure scores are strongly influenced by governance disclosure scores. Board meeting attendance is an important predictor of both scores, suggesting that more disciplined boards result in better sustainability performance. Boards with a higher percentage of independent directors also have higher disclosure scores and are more likely to have climate change and an environmental supply chain management policy in place. They are also more likely to be Global Reporting Initiative compliant, to have a green building policy and social supply chain management. A disturbing pattern emerges, however, when assessing firms' follow-through on declared commitments. It turns out that few firms that purport to have climate change policies in place have actually discussed climate change risks or opportunities. We discuss some implications of these preliminary findings.
Suggested Citation
Paul Shrivastava & Amr Addas, 2014.
"The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance,"
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 21-37, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:21-37
DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2014.887346
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:21-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.